Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| -- | 2013-02-24 |
| -- | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.34 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | -- |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| -- | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| -- | 189 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Rockchip RK3562 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, having a 69.2 score against 56.5. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a more recent 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a much better display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a much smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 has just a little better processing power than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.