Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.979.5
Basic Information
Apple
Android 14iOS 9.x
--2015-09-09
--12.00 x 8.68 x 0.27 inches
18.84 ounces25.50 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueGold and Gray
--Aluminum
--$ 424.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches12.9 inches
--2048 x 2732 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--265 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.88.2
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetApple A9X chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorTwister ARMv8-A, 64-bit (Single-Core 2260 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUPowerVR Series 7XT GPU
8.918.73
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 1.20 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.40 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.928.36
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA
Nano SIMNano SIM
06.1
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery10307mAh Li - Polymer Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.810.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.2
GPSGPS
--NFC
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Apple iPad Pro is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 90, with a 79.5 score against 57.9. The Apple iPad Pro has iOS 9.x operating system, while OSCAL Pad 90 counts with Android 14 operating system. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a bit better hardware performance than iPad Pro, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM memory.

The iPad Pro has an incredibly better looking display than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a bigger display. Apple iPad Pro and OSCAL Pad 90 feature incredibly similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage. IPad Pro has greater battery lifetime than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 10307mAh of battery capacity against 7700mAh.

The Apple iPad Pro counts with just a bit better camera than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.