Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.962.7
Basic Information
Apple
Android 14iOS 7.x, 6.1, 6
--2012-09-12
--4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches
18.84 ounces3.10 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueBlack and White
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
--$ 265.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches4 inches
--640 x 1136 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--326 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.88.3
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetApple A5 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM512 MB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUPowerVR SGX543 MP2 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU
8.918.01
Storage
128 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.17.7
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP5.00 MP + 1.20 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.40 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.927.92
Networks
--Wi-Fi
Nano SIM--
02.4
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery1030mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.82.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.0
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Gyroscope

Comparison review

The iPod Touch 5th Generation is slightly better than OSCAL Pad 90, with a 62.7 score against 57.9. The iPod Touch 5th Generation works with iOS 7.x operating system, while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 operating system. IPod Touch 5th Generation counts with a much sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a really smaller display.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPod Touch 5th Generation, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. OSCAL Pad 90 has a better CPU than iPod Touch 5th Generation, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.

The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better battery performance than iPod Touch 5th Generation, because it has a 648 percent larger battery capacity. OSCAL Pad 90 and iPod Touch 5th Generation feature very similar cameras, although the iPod Touch 5th Generation has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video and a lot less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.