Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.963.6
Basic Information
HTC
Android 14Android 3.1
--2011-08-31
--9.87 x 7.00 x 0.51 inches
18.84 ounces25.00 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueBlack
--$ 239.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches10.1 inches
--1280 x 768 pixels
IPS LCD LCD
--148 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.87
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processorScorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor
8 GB RAM1 GB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUAdreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU
8.918.28
Storage
128 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
10.17.12
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 1.30 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.927.37
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
Nano SIMSIM
05.9
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery7300mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
--900 hours standby time
8.88.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The HTC Jetstream is a little bit better than OSCAL Pad 90, with a 63.6 score against 57.9. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but HTC Jetstream has an older 3.1 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with just a little better processing power than HTC Jetstream, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.

The HTC Jetstream has a lot better display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than HTC Jetstream, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 90 has just a bit better camera than HTC Jetstream, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.

The OSCAL Pad 90 has a bit better battery life than HTC Jetstream, because it has a 7700mAh battery size instead of 7300mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.