Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.84 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| -- | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 8.8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 90, getting a score of 75.8 against 57.9. These tablets include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more recent 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and better performance.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a lot better looking display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a little smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a bit better processing unit than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The OSCAL Pad 90 has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a camera with a lot better 13 mega-pixels resolution. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has an 8220mAh battery size against 7700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.