Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
57.958.6
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 14Android 2.3.3, 2.2
--2010-09-02
--7.48 x 4.74 x 0.47 inches
18.84 ounces13.40 ounces
Space Grey; Sky Blue--
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
--$ 130.00
Display / Screen
10.9 inches7 inches
--1024 x 600 pixels
IPS LCD TFT
--170 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.86.6
Performance
Unisoc T606 chipset--
Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
8 GB RAM512 MB RAM
Mali-G57 GPUYes GPU
8.917.38
Storage
128 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
10.15.8
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP3.00 MP + 1.30 MP
f/2.00 aperture--
--720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution
7.926.16
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
Nano SIMSIM
04.1
Battery Life
7700mAh Li - Ion Battery4000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
8.85.92
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab is just a bit better than OSCAL Pad 90, getting a 58.6 score against 57.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Tab has a more recent 2.3.3 version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab features a more vivid display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a much smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy Tab, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. OSCAL Pad 90 shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Tab, because it has a camera with way more megapixels.

OSCAL Pad 90 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Tab, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Tab, because it has a 7700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.