Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2023-08-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 30.12 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 13000mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 12 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is better than OSCAL Spider 8, getting a 75.8 score against 64.4. Although Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is extremely older than OSCAL Spider 8, it's construction is much lighter and much thinner. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has the newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Spider 8 has Android 13 version, providing a couple additional features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has just a little better performance than OSCAL Spider 8, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a better display than OSCAL Spider 8, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a better resolution of 1600 x 2560px and a better pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
OSCAL Spider 8 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP. OSCAL Spider 8 has a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a 13000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.