Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 58.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 14 | Android 3.2, 2.3.3 |
| -- | 2011-02-15 |
| -- | 7.69 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches |
| 17.46 ounces | 14.82 ounces |
| Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue | -- |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 7 inches |
| -- | 1024 x 600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| -- | 170 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 1 GB (333 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 1470 hours standby time |
| 9.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is a bit better than HTC Flyer, with a overall score of 59.3 against 58.7. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's construction is extremely thinner but heavier than HTC Flyer. These tablets include Android OS (Operating System), but OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has the newer 14 version and HTC Flyer has Android 3.2 version.
The HTC Flyer counts with a better screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a much smaller screen. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Flyer, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a superior processing power than HTC Flyer, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi takes much better photographs and videos than HTC Flyer, because it has a much more MP back camera.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better battery duration than HTC Flyer, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.