Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 17.46 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| -- | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 9.12 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, with a 75.8 score against 59.3. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has the newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14, so it gives you some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a little bit better performance than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a GPU. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a much better looking display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a quite smaller display.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a lot better 13 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a battery performance that's just as good as OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has 8220mAh of battery capacity against 8200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.