Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| -- | 2013-02-24 |
| -- | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 17.46 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue | -- |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 8 inches |
| -- | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| -- | 189 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 8.0 is better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, with a 69.2 score against 59.3. Both of these tablets come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 8.0 has 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version, giving you some extra features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a way smaller display.
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 8.0 has a little better processing power than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a 78 percent bigger battery size. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.