Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 57.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Acer |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2013-09-04 | 2015-11-06 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 8.58 x 5.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 12.35 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| $ 610.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 283 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Intel Atom x7 Z8700 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Intel HD GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4420mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Compass |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way better than the Acer Predator 8, getting a score of 75.8 against 57.7. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has older 4.4.2 version and Acer Predator 8 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way older and heavier than Acer Predator 8, it's body is still a bit thinner.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Acer Predator 8, and although they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has an additional GPU and 1 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more vivid screen than Acer Predator 8, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a larger screen and a better 1600 x 2560 resolution.
The Acer Predator 8 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Acer Predator 8 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 128 GB. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a slightly better camera than Acer Predator 8, because it has a much better 8 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Acer Predator 8, because it has an 86% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) costs a lot more than Acer Predator 8, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.