| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 66.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-11-20 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 10.11 x 6.63 x 0.29 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 17.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Blue and Interstellar Grey |
| $ 610.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 208 pixels per inch |
| -- | 360 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 9.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a global score of 75.8, which is better than Blackview OSCAL Pad 18's overall score of 66.1. Both tablets we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has the newer 4.4.2 version while Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 has Android 13 version, providing the user some nice extra features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) construction is way older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Blackview OSCAL Pad 18.
The Blackview OSCAL Pad 18's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although the Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more vivid display than Blackview OSCAL Pad 18, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1600 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 has a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has 8800mAh of battery capacity.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.