Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
75.859.2
Basic Information
SamsungFujitsu
Android 4.4.2, 4.3Windows 8 Pro
2013-09-04--
9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches
19.29 ounces29.92 ounces
Black and White--
$ 610.00$ 1149.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches11.6 inches
2560 x 1600 pixels 1366 x 768 pixels
Super Clear LCDAH-IPS
299 pixels per inch135 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
8.46.9
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset--
Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processorIntel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor
3 GB (800 MHz) RAM4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM
Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU
9.278.91
Storage
32 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slotSD, SDHC external memory slot
7.5613.3
Camera
8.00 MP + 2.00 MP5.00 MP
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
6.495.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile Hotspot--
LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM--
Micro SIM--
7.12.4
Battery Life
8220mAh Li-Ion Battery3150mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
43 hours talk time--
9.125.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 4.0
GPS--
Infra-red port--
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer

Comparison review

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a global score of 75.8, which is much better than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's 59.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) comes with Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has Windows 8 Pro operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lighter and much thinner tablet than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702.

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit better hardware performance than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a slower graphics co-processor and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster). The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a way better looking display than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen density and a way higher resolution of 1600 x 2560.

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) shoots better photographs and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a way better 8 megapixels resolution camera in the back. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a way better battery duration than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has an 8220mAh battery capacity instead of 3150mAh.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.