| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Fujitsu |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Windows 8 Pro |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 610.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | AH-IPS |
| 299 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | -- |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a global score of 75.8, which is much better than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's 59.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) comes with Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has Windows 8 Pro operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lighter and much thinner tablet than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit better hardware performance than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a slower graphics co-processor and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster). The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a way better looking display than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen density and a way higher resolution of 1600 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) shoots better photographs and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a way better 8 megapixels resolution camera in the back. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a way better battery duration than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has an 8220mAh battery capacity instead of 3150mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.