| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 59.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 6.0 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2015-09-29 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 17.60 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 610.00 | $ 645.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1800 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 307 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra X1 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | NVIDIA Maxwell GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | -- |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way better than Google Pixel C, with a score of 75.8 against 59.4. Both of these tablets include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has 4.4.2 version and Google Pixel C has Android 6.0. Despite being the best device we compare here, we must note that it's also an extremely older, just a little thicker and a little heavier device.
The Google Pixel C counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a bit larger display, a little bit greater screen pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1800 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a very superior hardware performance than Google Pixel C, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has an extra GPU and a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel C's camera is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)'s camera, both have the same video quality, a 8 MP camera and the same video frame rate. Google Pixel C has slightly more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a much better battery life than Google Pixel C.
Even being the best tablet in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is also cheaper, making this tablet an easy choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.