Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 610.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has an overall score of 75.8, which is better than the OSCAL Pad 15's global score of 64.4. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) design is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the OSCAL Pad 15. Both of these tablets come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more recent 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a little faster processor than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a much better looking display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1600 x 2560 resolution.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has 224 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OSCAL Pad 15 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity.
OSCAL Pad 15 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.