Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 19.29 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Space Grey; Sky Blue |
| $ 610.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | -- |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc T606 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 8.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a global score of 75.8, which is much better than the OSCAL Pad 90's global score of 57.9. Both tablets in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more recent 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version, providing some extra features and better performance.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a much more vibrant screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller screen. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a bit faster processor than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a GPU. The OSCAL Pad 90 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 13 mega-pixels resolution.
OSCAL Pad 90 features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a bit better battery duration than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 8220mAh of battery capacity instead of 7700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.