Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-08-20 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 30.12 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 610.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| -- | 360 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 13000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is much better than OSCAL Spider 8, with a 75.8 score against 64.4. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a newer 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Spider 8 has Android 13 version, so it offers some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is an incredibly older device than OSCAL Spider 8, but Samsung managed to build it incredibly lighter and way thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a brighter display than OSCAL Spider 8, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a higher pixel count in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1600 x 2560 pixels. The OSCAL Spider 8 features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Spider 8, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. The OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a 13000mAh battery size instead of 8220mAh.
The OSCAL Spider 8 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.