Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 19.29 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| $ 610.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | -- |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a global score of 75.8, which is a lot better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's score of 59.3. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more recent 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version, so it provides the user some extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a quite smaller display.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a back facing camera with way more MP. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a battery performance that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) one, although the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a 0 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.