Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 | Android 13 |
| 2013-02-24 | -- |
| 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 11.92 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 8.0 has an overall score of 69.2, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Pad 15's 64.4 general score. Galaxy Note 8.0's body is a little bit thicker but much lighter than OSCAL Pad 15. These tablets come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 8.0 has the newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features a bit better performance than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has 4 less 1.6 GHz cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note 8.0 features a bit more vivid screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 800 x 1280 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
OSCAL Pad 15 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. OSCAL Pad 15 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Pad 15 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.