Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.1 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 3.0 | Android 13 |
| 2011-02-13 | -- |
| 9.69 x 6.71 x 0.43 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 21.13 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| -- | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (24 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.37 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 3.9 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.16 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OSCAL Pad 15 has a global score of 64.4, which is much better than the Galaxy Tab 10.1v's 57.1 general score. The OSCAL Pad 15 is a lighter and incredibly thinner device than Galaxy Tab 10.1v. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the OSCAL Pad 15 has the newer 13 version and Galaxy Tab 10.1v has Android 3.0 version.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v features a little sharper display than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a bit worse resolution of 800 x 1280, a quite smaller display and a just a bit lower screen pixels density.
The OSCAL Pad 15 features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Tab 10.1v, because it has 240 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OSCAL Pad 15 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v, because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v counts with a slightly better camera than OSCAL Pad 15, although it has a lot worse 8 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.