Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
58.857.9
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 4.0, 3.2Android 14
2011-08-28--
9.09 x 6.21 x 0.34 inches--
16.05 ounces18.84 ounces
--Space Grey; Sky Blue
Display / Screen
8.9 inches10.9 inches
1280 x 800 pixels --
TFTIPS LCD
170 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.25.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 chipset
Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
--8 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
7.928.91
Storage
16 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
4.410.1
Camera
3.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution--
5.617.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM--
SIMNano SIM
6.30
Battery Life
6100mAh Li-Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
7.68.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0, EDRBluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE is slightly better than the OSCAL Pad 90, with a 58.8 score against 57.9. These tablets come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE has older 4.0 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE counts with a much better looking display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a little smaller display.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE, because it has more internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a quite superior performance than Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE, because it has a greater number of cores.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features a much better camera than Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP. OSCAL Pad 90 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE, because it has a 7700mAh battery size instead of 6100mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.