Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
58.157.9
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 3.0Android 14
2011-03-22--
9.09 x 6.21 x 0.34 inches--
15.98 ounces18.84 ounces
--Space Grey; Sky Blue
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 269.00--
Display / Screen
8.9 inches10.9 inches
1280 x 800 pixels --
TFTIPS LCD
170 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.25.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 chipset
Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
--8 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
7.478.91
Storage
64 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
7.710.1
Camera
3.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution--
5.617.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM--
SIMNano SIM
3.90
Battery Life
6000mAh Li-Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
7.528.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0, EDRBluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy Tab 8.9 has a global score of 58.1, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Pad 90's 57.9 score. These tablets use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Tab 8.9 has 3.0 version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. Galaxy Tab 8.9 features a much better display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a bit smaller display.

OSCAL Pad 90 features a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9, because it has 6 more processing cores. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Tab 8.9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Pad 90 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Tab 8.9, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.

The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Tab 8.9, because it has a 28 percent more battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.