Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 60.4 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Windows 8 |
| 2016-04-01 | 2012-06-04 |
| 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.98 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 216 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 6.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Tab A (2016) is just a bit better than the Asus VivoTab, with a 60.4 score against 57.5. The Galaxy Tab A (2016) counts with Android 5.1 Lollipop OS, while Asus VivoTab works with Windows 8 OS. Galaxy Tab A (2016) is a much lighter tablet than the Asus VivoTab, but both have the same thickness.
Asus VivoTab has a bit better performance than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor and more RAM. Galaxy Tab A (2016) has just a bit better looking screen than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a bit worse 800 x 1280 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display density.
Asus VivoTab has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Tab A (2016) counts with a little bit better camera than Asus VivoTab, although it has a much worse video quality and a lot lower 5 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a really longer battery life than Asus VivoTab.
Galaxy Tab A (2016) not only is the best tablets of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this tablet a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.