Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 60.4 | 61 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Windows RT |
| 2016-04-01 | 2012-06-04 |
| 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches | 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.98 ounces | 18.87 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 216 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 GPU | ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 6.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus VivoTab RT has a score of 61, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Tab A (2016)'s 60.4 overall score. Asus VivoTab RT has Windows RT OS, and Galaxy Tab A (2016) works with Android 5.1 Lollipop OS. Asus VivoTab RT is a notably older and notably heavier tablet device than Galaxy Tab A (2016), but Asus could make it just a little thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a bit more vivid screen than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has a little bit worse 800 x 1280px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per screen inch. The Asus VivoTab RT counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Asus VivoTab RT counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Tab A (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus VivoTab RT also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a way better battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab RT. The Asus VivoTab RT features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way better 1920x1080 video definition.
Although Asus VivoTab RT is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy Tab A (2016), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Tab A (2016). If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy Tab A (2016), giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.