Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.757.9
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 4.4Android 14
7.68 x 4.58 x 0.38 inches--
10.88 ounces18.84 ounces
Black and WhiteSpace Grey; Sky Blue
$ 119.00--
Display / Screen
7 inches10.9 inches
1024 x 600 pixels --
TFT IPS LCD
170 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.35.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 chipset
Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
1 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.198.91
Storage
8 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
4.6210.1
Camera
2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution--
5.287.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
3600mAh Li - Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
5.68.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
AccelerometerAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The OSCAL Pad 90 is slightly better than the Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0, getting a general score of 57.9 against 56.7. Both tablets in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the OSCAL Pad 90 has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0 has Android 4.4, providing the user some nice extra features. The OSCAL Pad 90 design is incredibly heavier but much thinner than Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0.

OSCAL Pad 90 features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0, because it has a higher number of cores and 7 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0 has a bit more vivid display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a way smaller display. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.

OSCAL Pad 90 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0, because it has a way more MP back-facing camera. OSCAL Pad 90 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Tab E Lite 7.0, because it has 7700mAh of battery capacity.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.