Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
58.659.3
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 2.3.3, 2.2Android 14
2010-09-02--
7.48 x 4.74 x 0.47 inches--
13.40 ounces17.46 ounces
--Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 130.00--
Display / Screen
7 inches10.5 inches
1024 x 600 pixels --
TFTIPS LCD
170 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.65.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
Single-Core 1000 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
512 MB RAM6 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
7.388.82
Storage
32 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotNo SD card slot
5.813.3
Camera
3.00 MP + 1.30 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution--
6.167.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
Mobile Hotspot--
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM--
SIM--
4.10
Battery Life
4000mAh Li-Ion Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
5.929.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Tab, with a 59.3 score against 58.6. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi's body is notably heavier but much thinner than Samsung Galaxy Tab. Both of these tablets come with Android OS (operating system), but OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Tab has Android 2.3.3 version.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy Tab, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Tab has a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a lot smaller screen. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Tab, because it has a back camera with a much better resolution.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Tab, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Tab, because it has a 105% more battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.