Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.459.3
Basic Information
Samsung
Android 2.2Android 14
7.48 x 4.74 x 0.47 inches--
13.58 ounces17.46 ounces
--Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 205.00--
Display / Screen
7 inches10.5 inches
1024 x 600 pixels --
TFTIPS LCD
170 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.15.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
Single-Core 1000 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
592 MB RAM6 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
7.388.82
Storage
16 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
5.7213.3
Camera
3.00 MP + 1.30 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution--
5.617.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
4000mAh Li-Ion Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
5.929.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is slightly better than Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, with a 59.3 score against 56.4. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has newer 14 version and Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi has Android 2.2. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi construction is way thinner but heavier than the Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a better performance than Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi has an incredibly better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a lot smaller screen. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Tab Wi-Fi, because it has a 105% larger battery size.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.