Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2014-05-15 | 2013-09-04 |
| 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| $ 249.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | Super Clear LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Kepler GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6700mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 8.08 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has an overall score of 75.8, which is better than the Xiaomi MiPad's 64.4 global score. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)'s design is a little bit thinner but way heavier than Xiaomi MiPad, and both were only released 8 months apart. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi MiPad, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a graphics co-processor and more RAM.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1600 x 2560 resolution and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi MiPad takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014). Both have a same resolution back camera, the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features superior battery performance than Xiaomi MiPad, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) costs a lot more than the Xiaomi MiPad, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.