Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 63.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 3.1 |
| 2021-09-23 | 2011-08-31 |
| 10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches | 9.87 x 7.00 x 0.51 inches |
| 18.03 ounces | 25.00 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Pearl White | Black |
| -- | $ 239.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1280 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 148 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset |
| Kryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU |
| 3.78 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8720mAh Battery | 7300mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 900 hours standby time |
| 9.44 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC Jetstream has a general score of 63.6, which is better than the Xiaomi pad 5's 57.7 general score. Both tablets in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but HTC Jetstream has older 3.1 version while Xiaomi pad 5 has Android 12 version. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also an extremely older, noticeably thicker and way heavier tablet device.
The HTC Jetstream has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has a much lower screen pixel density, a much lower 768 x 1280 resolution and a quite smaller display. The Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than HTC Jetstream, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
HTC Jetstream has a lot better processing power than Xiaomi pad 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 6 less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Xiaomi pad 5 features a very superior camera than HTC Jetstream, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way better 13 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi pad 5 counts with better battery lifetime than HTC Jetstream, because it has 8720mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.