Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | LG |
| Android 4.2.1 | -- |
| 2013-04-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.16 x 2.68 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Acer Liquid E2, having an 81.3 score against 55.6. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and much thinner cellphone than Acer Liquid E2, but it is also heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a more vivid display than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a much higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a really larger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite superior hardware performance than Acer Liquid E2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater camera than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way better video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 60 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Acer Liquid E2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Acer Liquid E2, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.