Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 55.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2013-04-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.16 x 2.68 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the Acer Liquid E2, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 55.6. Galaxy Note 3's design is somewhat thinner but heavier than the Acer Liquid E2, and both of them were only released 4 months apart. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version and Acer Liquid E2 has Android 4.2.1.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a brighter display than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a lot greater pixels density, a bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Galaxy Note 3 features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 64 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a larger amount of RAM, a larger number of faster cores and a faster 600 megahertz graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 features a much better battery life than Acer Liquid E2, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better videos and photos than Acer Liquid E2, because it has a lot better video definition and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the Acer Liquid E2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.