Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android |
| 2016-11-10 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.05 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows's score of 72.1. The Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Galaxy A32 body is a lot newer, but noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows.
Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a higher pixel density. The Galaxy A32 counts with a greater storage to install applications and games than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better processing unit than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A32 also has 4 more CPU cores (although slower). Galaxy A32 captures a bit better photos and videos than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery life than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.