Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 2013-02-24 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.53 x 2.72 x 0.32 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.10 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 650 hours standby time 27 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+, getting a 71.5 score against 65. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ has Android 4.4.4. Even being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a a bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+.
Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ has a better looking display than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a bit bigger display, a much higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a higher display pixel density. The Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ also has a better GPU and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+, because it has 32 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 64 GB. Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ also has a lot bigger aperture and a back camera with lot more MP.
Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+ counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 2500mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.