Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.1 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.25 x 1.81 x 0.60 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.29 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | TFT |
| 129 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.68 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR is a bit better than the Alcatel OT-209, getting a 27.9 score against 27.1. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Cricket CAPTR body is thicker and heavier than the Alcatel OT-209. Alcatel OT-209 has a slightly better looking screen than Cricket CAPTR, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 128 x 128 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Cricket CAPTR's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as Alcatel OT-209's one. The Alcatel OT-209 and the Cricket CAPTR both count with similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processor. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a superior battery duration than Alcatel OT-209, because it has a 920mAh battery size against 500mAh.
Cricket CAPTR captures way better pictures and videos than Alcatel OT-209.
Cricket CAPTR costs a bit more than Alcatel OT-209, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.