Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 31 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 3.78 x 1.84 x 0.66 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.46 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| Black, Gray and Red | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| 114 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.54 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Alcatel OT-565 has an overall score of 31, which is slightly better than Motorola W175's overall score of 28.6. The Alcatel OT-565 design is thicker but lighter than Motorola W175. Alcatel OT-565 features a little sharper screen than Motorola W175, because it has a bit better pixels quantity in each display inch and a bit higher resolution of 160 x 128.
Alcatel OT-565 has a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola W175, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 2 GB. The Motorola W175 has a processor that's very similar to the Alcatel OT-565 one, they have 0 CPU cores. The Motorola W175 features a very superior battery lifetime than Alcatel OT-565, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity.
The Alcatel OT-565 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola W175.
Alcatel OT-565 and the Motorola W175 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.