Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than Google Pixel 2, getting an 85.3 score against 81.6. IPhone 11 Pro Max is a newer phone than Google Pixel 2, but it is way heavier and just a bit thicker. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little better pixel count in each inch in the display, a bigger display and a better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone 11 Pro Max shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory capacity. IPhone 11 Pro Max features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.