Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is slightly better than iPhone 11 Pro Max's 85.3 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and iPhone 11 Pro Max were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is a little thicker but just a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, and iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A90 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.