Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. IPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 operating system. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, we must note that it is also notably older, a little bit heavier and incredibly thicker.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a much brighter display and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 44% greater battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.