Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than iPhone 11 Pro's 84.9 general score. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with Android 11 operating system, and iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter cellphone than iPhone 11 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little greater screen pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage. Google Pixel 4a 5G has longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G's camera is just as good as Apple iPhone 11 Pro's camera, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations, they both have the same sensor size, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.