Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting an 84.9 score against 75.8. The iPhone 11 Pro design is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it's thicker and heavier. IPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a superior hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro also has a higher number of cores and a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have the same camera aperture.
Moto Z Force features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has a bit better battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.