Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 84.9 against 77.4. Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is thicker and much heavier. IPhone 11 Pro has a faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z2 Play has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 11 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3046mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 11 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in low light situations, and they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.