Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting an 84.9 score against 76.2. The iPhone 11 Pro design is a little bit thicker but just a little lighter than the Galaxy A16 5G. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A16 5G counts with Android 14 OS. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 11 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same display brightness, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
IPhone 11 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture. The Galaxy A16 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 64% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.