Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro's 84.9 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is newer than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, it is a little thicker and a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 OS, and Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels quantity per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 48 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.