Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro's 84.9 score. The Galaxy Z Flip design is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, even though both were released only a couple of months apart. The Galaxy Z Flip comes with Android 12 operating system, and Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip's camera is just as good as iPhone 11 Pro's camera, both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate, a same resolution back camera and a 0.39 inches sensor.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is more expensive than iPhone 11 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the iPhone 11 Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get iPhone 11 Pro, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.