Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 has a score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Despite of the fact the Apple iPhone 11 is incredibly older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. The Apple iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores and 12 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than iPhone 11, because it has a way brighter screen, a lot larger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a higher pixels density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a much larger back camera sensor, a much better video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 11, because it has an 83% bigger battery size.
IPhone 11 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.