Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 14.x | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.62 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 mini is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 88.5 against 77.8. The Apple iPhone 12 mini works with iOS 14.x OS, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 OS. Apple iPhone 12 mini is a incredibly older and way thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple managed to make it extremely lighter anyway.
Apple iPhone 12 mini has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 12 GB less RAM and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid display than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much larger screen, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and much more brightness.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery duration than iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 156% greater battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Apple iPhone 12 mini is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.