Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. The iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is way newer and noticeably thinner, but noticeably heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola DROID Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a 64-bit processor, a greater number of faster cores and more RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3687mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.