Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.62 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 93.2 score against 77.8. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, we must highlight that it's also a much older, just a little heavier and a lot thicker phone. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro comes with Android 14 operating system.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking screen than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a really brighter display and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a way better video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3687mAh.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.