Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | -- |
| 2020-10-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.66 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 score. IPhone 12 Pro's design is newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than Galaxy A50. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and more RAM.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a way better 25 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A50 counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A50, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.