Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 829.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.62 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 has a general score of 88.7, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though iPhone 12 is extremely older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still a lot lighter. IPhone 12 has iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 operating system.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than iPhone 12, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with much more screen brightness, a way bigger screen and a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. The Apple iPhone 12 features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12, because it has more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than iPhone 12, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the iPhone 12 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.